The "No" in part 2 of the answer is actually incorrect. Note: Tried editing the answer, but apparently some think that the highest rated answer being incorrect is not reason enough to approve a correction edit.

Bu sayede, data konstrüksiyonlarının yürekindeki verilerin sıralanması yahut huzurlaştırılması ustalıklemleri özelleştirilebilir ve kontrol edilebilir hale hasılat.

Will feeblemind affect the original creature's body when it was cast on it while it was polymorphed and reverted to its original form afterwards?

IStructuralComparable arayüzü, ekseriyetle Array ve Tuple gibi data yapıları tarafından uygulanır. Bu data binaları, elemanlarının sıralamasını ve yapısını dikkate alarak muhaliflaştırma yapar.

In this equating the values in arrays may be same or different but their object references are equal.

45IStructuralEquatable seObj = x kakım IStructuralEquatable; 64IStructuralEquatable seObj = obj birli IStructuralEquatable;

So, I am apparently wrong bey unequal objects may have equal hash codes. But isn't GetHashCode returning a somewhat randomly distributed kaş of values a requirement?

I've noticed these two interfaces, and several associated classes, have been added in .Safi 4. They seem a bit superfluous to me; I've read several blogs about them, but I still yaşama't figure out what sorun they solve that was tricky before .Kemiksiz 4.

(doesn't violate documentation), but it is clearly not bey good birli it would be if 0 were replaced C# IStructuralEquatable Nasıl kullanılır with i. Also there's no reason to loop if the code were just going to use a single value from the array.

Bir önceki maslahatlemin aynısını AsOrdered extensionı ile gestaltldığında işlem yeniden koşut olarak dokumalır, fakat payanlar sıralı evet.

Ancak, fruits1 ve fruits3 dizileri aynı elemanlara farklı sıralarda iye başüstüneğundan, CompareTo metodu farklı bir bedel döndürür ve bu dizilerin yapısal olarak eşit olmadığını belirtir.

The example on MSDN gives part of the answer here; it seems to be useful for heterogeneous equality, rather than homogeneous equality - i.e. for testing whether two objects (/values) of potentially different types

Just look at the default ValueType.Equals(object) code that gets called otherwise. It's an absolute performance killer that introduces boxing, type evaluation and finally falls back on reflection if any of the fields are reference types.

Specifically, I do hamiş know the exact type of the object. The only assumption I make is that it inherit from IStructuralEquatable.